It seems as though when the OnePlus 9 and OnePlus 9 Pro were launched back in March, some users informed them that their devices’ battery life and and heat management could be improved. In light of these events unfolding, OnePlus responded by stating that these changes were a result of user feedback. Nevertheless, Geekbench clearly thought this was enough to warrant delisting the phones from their charts. Regular apps were throttled, while others like benchmarking tools were allowed to use the the whole CPU. Snapdragon 865 or Snapdragon 888 has no such issues running Genshin Impact at above 50fps despite it scoring lower in WildFire test.While that typically involves boosting beyond regular spec, the OnePlus devices are actually doing the opposite. Saying that A14 is better than Snapdragon 888 because of higher WildFire scores is complete BS. All I said is that Apple's score in GeekBench and WildFire are useless as a lot of other things matter when it comes to overall device performance. I never said Apple was cheating in benchmarks. S21 Ultra (Exynos) also scores average 45-50fps as it doesn't have dedicated cooing. Nothing to do with optimization, everything to do with Apple failing to put any dedicated cooling inside. After that it drops to 45fps average as it has no dedicated cooling. Actually it gets 60fps just like Snapdragon 888 devices, but only limited for the first 5 minutes. It being not optimized for A14 argument was valid when it was launched where it was giving below 40fps on average. P C M, Why do you haters always give example of Genshin impact ! T. I would never use one, not to mention pay for it! If you are ok using a replica phone, that state one thing on paper, but in reality you get a totally different thing, go ahead. now, another chinese brand gets caught lying in benchmarks!Īnd this was just what people found by accident! Most of their brands do this, but being cheap brands nobody really pays attention to them. they were caught STEALING photos from the internet from professional photographers and said those were made by them, with their phones, never paying royalties to those photographers. they were caught lying AT LEAST 3 times about the fact that the photos used in their commercials were taken with their phones, when in reality they were made with high-end professional DSLR cameras that cost thousands of dollars. People from XDA developers forum discovered this by accident while trying to do benchmarks. they were stating that their phones had USF internal storage when in reality they were actually using ancient eMMC technology. Who-a-who was caught lying about multiple things on multiple occasions: This is why I will never use a china brand. we can’t beat the best so let’s create our own competition where our own rules make you a winner, then the same cheats are sanctioning better rule benders for doing exactly what they do It’s really ridiculous how these reviewers and forums have driven so much hype on a lot of things without even educating people properly, sometimes understanding how things work is even more important than the numbers and specs they shove down our throats, now you have a bunch of fanboys who yell about Chinese phones doing 700k+ on Antutu but can’t beat an Apple chip in a real world case use or even Geekbench, better still they dismiss Geekbench as frauds when real world use and processing clearly favors Apple.Īntutu is like. If logs are available for what goes into which cores, they probably give points per core. Their methods makes sense, but it allows for unnecessary points that don’t necessarily indicate performance and most importantly cheating, u don’t even need to cheat the old fashioned way anymore, just force all the load to the big cores. The day many of you realize Antutu scores every chip, modem, component or whatever in your smartphone SOC and what that even means, you’d understand why snapdragons dominate Antutu and why I don’t even see it as a proper benchmark.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |